Traditional Review

When actitivities are submitted directly to the PAC, they will follow a process like traditional peer review. A minimum of two reviewers will be solicited to review the activity, complete the appropriate Feedback Rubrics, and share their thoughts with the curator. The curator will share this feedback with the author. 

If the activity meets the appropriate standards of a particular submission category, the curator will recommend posting the activity in the next issue. If the activity would better fit in a different section, they will share that recommendation at this point. Some revision of the activity based on the peer feedback might be recommended before posting.